Countries and corporations around the globe are talking up their climate credentials, pledging to achieve “net-zero” carbon emissions or become “carbon neutral” in the next few decades. But when we delve into the details, those pledges seldom live up to their promises.
“I think there’s increasing momentum behind genuine commitments to getting to net zero. I think along with that, there’s always going to be some element of brainwashing,” explains Christopher Greig, senior research scientist at the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment at Princeton University. “There are people who are basically being forced into making these commitments by shareholder pressure.”
The U.S. aims to move to net zero emissions by 2050. China aims for the same in 2060. One-fifth of the world’s 2000 largest public firms have committed to net-zero targets, according to a new report by the U.K non-profit Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU). Visa, AstraZeneca, and Alaska Airlines all plan to eliminate carbon emissions by at least 2040, while other corporations like Apple have committed to 100% carbon neutral supply chains and products by 2030.
Unfortunately, there are no standard guidelines for achieving net-zero or carbon-neutral emissions. That means companies and countries can create their own definitions. Companies that pledge to be carbon neutral are not necessarily promising to remove CO2 from their activities. Instead, they can support environmental projects that would offset their own emissions. Examples are carbon offsets from groups that install renewable energy, plant and protect trees or provide other means to clean up the atmosphere.
Those plans aren’t necessarily realistic, or helpful. For instance, there is only so much space around the earth to plant trees. A recent Oxfam report calculated the total land required for planned carbon removal could be five times the size of India or the equivalent of all farmland on the planet. Research from the Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative shows less than 5% of offsets actually remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
“Without a scientific basis, and a true pathway to net-zero...some of the effects of these trades, or these commitments, might be simply unrealizable,” explains Rachel Kyte, a climate adviser for the U.N. secretary-general and the dean of the Fletcher School at Tufts University.
So what should corporations do to avoid hollow green pledges? “A corporation needs to be able to measure and verify its emissions, both within its own operations, but also upstream and downstream of its operations,” Greig explains. “And it needs to be able to measure, verify, and show the outside world just how it’s going against those targets.”
The answer is not simple and will require resources and complicated accounting. But many argue these steps are necessary to decrease the risk that catastrophic climate change will become unavoidable.
It is important that all stakeholders protect and save this planet from extinction due to immeasurable carbon emissions from industrial and other productive activities. Carbon neutrality is not the ultimate solution but the reduction and elimination of carbon emissions. We only have this planet to stay on, if it is recklessly destroyed, there will be no other place to stay.